Crypto Industry Asks UK to Think Globally as Government Closes Consultation on Proposed Rules

The U.K.’s crypto stakeholders have largely welcomed the nation’s proposed legislation for the industry – but they want the country to collaborate with regulators globally to avoid post-Brexit isolation, particularly in the wake of the European Union’s Markets in Crypto Assets (MiCA) regulation, a review of public comments found.

The U.K. has been consulting the public on its proposed strategy for the crypto sector since February, and the consultation period closed on April 30 with global industry titans submitting their views.

“This constitutes a welcome step towards establishing regulatory clarity for crypto assets in the U.K….Thoughtfully applied, these frameworks will accelerate the adoption of socially beneficial innovation, while reducing both criminal and financial risks,” said Riccardo Tordera Ricchi, head of policy at U.K.-based The Payments Association, in a statement to CoinDesk.

Countries around the world have been looking to construct rules for the burgeoning crypto sector, and with MiCA in its final stages, the pressure is mounting for countries to decide on their own approach.

Instead of creating an entirely new set of rules for the crypto space like MiCA, the U.K. wants to bring crypto into the scope of its existing regulatory frameworks, and the government may publish crypto specific rules in the next 12 months.

The U.K.’s plan is to regulate crypto under the Financial Services Markets Act and have an authorization regime for digital asset companies. It also hopes to regulate stablecoins under the country’s payments rules and set up a market abuse regime to protect investors. The Financial Services and Markets Bill, which will give regulators the power to oversee crypto by extending rules for financial instruments, is already making its way through Parliament.

“If you compare it to MiCA, where the first analysis that you will do is look at the assets, and the asset will tell you if you're falling into the regulatory perimeter or not… here, it's a little bit different. It's based on financial activity, which I have to say from a regulatory point of view is a hard thing to tackle,” said Meiran Shtibel, associate general counsel at U.S.-based Fireblocks.

The lobby group CryptoUK supports the government's “same risk, same regulatory outcome” approach, said Su Carpenter, director of operations at the group, in a press statement.

“It solves for the desired outcome rather than applying generic rules – capturing the intricacies of novel innovations, and their unique benefits/risks,” Changpeng Zhao, CEO of Binance tweeted recently.

Read more: What the Bank of England’s Stablecoins Regime Could Look Like

Global strategy

The U.K., which left the European Union in 2020 in the infamous “Brexit,” can't go on its crypto regulation journey alone without global collaboration, according to the Association of Financial Markets (AFME) in Europe.

When constructing a market abuse regime, the U.K. needs to ensure what it sets out is compatible with other jurisdictions that host global crypto companies and can work with standard-setters like the International Organization of Securities Commissions, Group of Seven (G7) and Group of 20 (G20), said Nick Taylor, head of policy in Europe, Middle East and Africa at U.K.-based exchange Luno. Luno, like CoinDesk, is owned by Digital Currency Group.

CryptoUK is also calling for the country to align with global regulators over disclosure requirements for crypto companies.

“It would make sense for the regulatory regime to harmonize [with global regulators], to the extent reasonably possible, to allow as seamless cross-jurisdictional operation as possible,” Tordera said.

Read more: Global Crypto Regulation Needs Coordination, Not Duplication, Legal Experts Say

In its response to the government’s proposals, ​​AFME also warned that the U.K.’s planned crypto authorization regime could damage its reputation as an open market by making it difficult for foreign firms to access it. The government suggested in its consultation that the regime would require firms serving U.K. clients – regardless of where they are based – to sign up with the Financial Conduct Authority to continue business in the country.

The AFME doesn’t recommend this approach and says it steers too far from how the U.K. usually regulates financial institutions. CryptoUK called for overseas companies to be exempt from local authorization, and for the government to stick to regulating companies based in the U.K.

The licensing regime should come with a transition period that allows crypto companies to continue operating while they go through the authorization process, AFME and Taylor suggested. CryptoUK recommended a quicker process for firms already registered with the FCA – something that France is mulling as it prepares to implement MiCA.

“It is critical that regulators urgently adopt a timely and proportionate authorization process for complete and accurate applications, and endeavor to avoid duplicative information requests of businesses, taking into account the supervisory history of businesses during the authorization process,” Binance said in its response to the proposal.

Read more: UK Crypto Firms and Regulator Blame Each Other for Industry Exodus

AFME, CryptoUK and Binance also asked for clarity on the scope of economic activities that fall under the existing rules, along with the treatment of assets like non-fungible tokens (NFTs). All three parties suggested that algorithmic stablecoins should fall within the U.K.’s rules – something that has been on regulators’ radar since the collapse of the Terra ecosystem in May 2022.

A blurry future

The U.K.’s Conservative government, under the leadership of Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, has said it wants to position the country as a hub for crypto, and may be pushing to finalize relevant rules ahead of general elections, which are set for 2025 but could occur sooner.

CryptoUK expects proposed stablecoin legislation and rules for the broader crypto space – what the government refers to as the first two phases in its proposals – to be implemented by the end of 2024.

“We suggest taking a broader view at all of the enablers for the U.K. to deliver on its ambition to become a global hub for the crypto industry, which includes a proportionate application of FinProm [Financial Promotion] rules to trading venues, addressing concerns of de-banking by the crypto industry and progressive tax policy that addresses the nuances of the asset class,” Carpenter said in a statement.

Member of Parliament Lisa Cameron told CoinDesk she has had positive discussions with lawmakers about expanding the U.K.’s crypto tax framework.

Read more: UK’s Crypto Future Is Bright No Matter Who’s in Charge, Lawmaker Says